13 responses to “C39V2 2000rds Later: Deformation…”

1. 

   Tim N

   August 27, 2017

   I had an n-pap for about 340 rounds and got rid of it, it was wearing out fast. After the comments about the wood, I hope I’m not one of the last to buy one of your furniture sets. I have some wood on my Arsenal and pimping my VEPR.
   Thanks for the videos !

   Reply
   1. 

      Rob

      September 1, 2017

      What was wearing on it? My npap is a work hog.

      Reply
      1. 

         Tim N

         September 3, 2017

         After 340 rounds the tail on the carrier was mushrooming worse than the one you had at 2,000 rounds, it also had a rivet set crooked on the front trunnion and it was loose.
         At that point I figured it would be better to get rid of it while it was still able to shoot. I put a mastermount and m-4 stock on it but the mastermount kept moving. I’d file the pins and re-tighten them w/the blue lock-tite, it didn’t help and the mount kept moving. It turned out I was squeezing the receiver a little more each time I refiled the pins.
         So enough with the frustration, I got rid of it.

         Reply
      2. 

         Tim N

         September 15, 2017

         Isn’t your Zastava n-pap a yugo?
         The one I got rid of was not a yugo, but it was a Zastava n-pap.

         Reply
2. 

   Dan Dunn

   August 29, 2017

   Looks like more of the same crap from Century Arms – “soft cast steel bolt , carrier and gas piston ” .
   I would have thought for sure that these later C39V2’s were now good to go .
   Trusting this company to do the right thing is apparently ” too much to ask ” .
   As long as we continue to accept their defective cast iron junk parts , they will continue to victimize us ….
   it is sort of like ” trying to get your leg back from a shark “.
   You can’t shame these knuckleheads , so maybe Rob can tell us ” why he even wastes his time trying to
   reason with these vermin “…. I guess that is all I have to say !

   Reply
3. 

   Rob

   September 1, 2017

   Looking at trading my kahr k9 elite for an opap build on a dci receiver. Worth the trade?

   Reply
   1. 

      E.T.

      September 8, 2017

      Depends a lot of the quality of the build. If it was a Zastava produced OPAP the answer would be a definite “yes”.

      Reply
      1. 

         Rob

         September 16, 2017

         It’s an m70 actually on a dci rpk receiver.

         Reply
4. 

   Reggie Martin

   September 3, 2017

   What kind of but stock is that you guys put on the C39V2?

   Reply
   1. 

      Rob Ski

      September 3, 2017

      This: http://shop.akoperatorsunionlocal4774.com/GL-CORE-Stock-with-Cheek-Riser-GL-CORE-Stock.htm

      Reply
5. 

   Hector

   September 4, 2017

   It still fires and ‘nothing is broken, that’s what matters. A bolt can be ordered, usage but the trunnion needs to retain its integrity. I think it will be close. Excellent video.

   I have a question, “does the C39v2 being tested have the TAPCO or RAK-1 trigger assembly?” I ask because you might be testing the old model. At 4 lbs., the RAK-1’s are superb, much better than an M-16’s 7.5-12 lbs. At 4 lbs, that is sniper weight; plus, the hammer is curved smoothed. My sniper manual says:

   SNIPER: TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT
   TC 23-14; June, 1999
   Headquarters, Department of the Army

   Chapter 2 of 5 Test: Equipment
   13 QUESTIONS
   Q1. The trigger weight of a sniping rifle should be 4.5-4.75 lbs.

   Reply
   1. 

      Rob Ski

      September 10, 2017

      New C39V2 have RAK1 triggers for sure.

      Reply
6. 

   Dan Dunn

   September 10, 2017

   Although I have only fired my C39V2 enough to check the accuracy and proper function , I have owned many
   of these imported AK’s and can tell you from experience that this rifle ” is by far ” the most accurate AK I have
   ever owned …. in reality , this is something that the intelligent imbeciles over at Century have managed to do
   right …. don’t forget to give credit where credit is due !
   I don’t think most Century rifle owners hate Century Arms – they are just “mad as hell ” about all the crap that
   is wrong about their concoctions …. as I have said before : Everything is worth something – even a RAS47 ….
   just be careful what you pay for it !

   Reply